| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jackrodgers EVDO Addict
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 1131
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 6:15 am Post subject: Other abusers Don't Pay Their Fair Share |
|
|
Users who consume a lot of bandwidth are getting negative attention.
Those who aren't getting much attention are the businesses taking advantage of the internet and its free bandwidth to sell products, show ads and movies, etc. (Spammers are another problem.)
Apple and other companies are taking advantage of the free internet to sell DVDs and CDs online bypassing the need to hire staff to locate and package the DVDs and CDs.
Online movie sales and rentals are devastating the movie theatres and another industry may fall victim to computers, just as the type setting industry 20 years ago was crushed by amateur typesetters with 200 fonts (very few paid for) and a laser printer.
Perhaps instead of blaming the users, the sellers should pay for the expansion of the internet and its services? Those who get bumped for exceeding 5 Gigs might enjoy seeing a company pay extra for selling 50,000 GIGS of data online? And the advertisers such as Google who may each transmit Gigs of Gigs of ads FOR FREE! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ebiz EVDO Junkie
Joined: 25 Oct 2006 Posts: 365 Location: Reno, NV
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Touché, Jack. Spirit is right, but the application is a bitch legally. It's like the airlines trying to sue McDonald's for making consumers fatter, thereby costing the airlines more in fuel charges.
Suites have been successful by governments against the tobacco companies because of gov't rising medical costs on very similar premis, but the cost of mounting such suites is staggering.
Besides, the regulatory implications for the Internet would have more negative than positive effects.
In the end, it's the consumer who needs to discipline for his own consumption - whether for cigarettes, Big Macs or data volume. _________________ Vista64 & EX720 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dan1101 EVDO User
Joined: 17 May 2007 Posts: 64
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| In the long run Internet usage really needs to be unlimited. Isn't it much more efficient to download a movie than it is to spend fuel to transport DVDs? Whatever your need for large amounts of bandwidth, who's to say it's not legitimate? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ebiz EVDO Junkie
Joined: 25 Oct 2006 Posts: 365 Location: Reno, NV
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dan1101 wrote: | | In the long run Internet usage really needs to be unlimited. Isn't it much more efficient to download a movie than it is to spend fuel to transport DVDs? Whatever your need for large amounts of bandwidth, who's to say it's not legitimate? | ... and farmers and cities should have unlimited water, and we should all have unlimited access to aviation and food should be free... ain't going to happen. Someone has to pay for it. Some city governments have mounted projects to provide free Wifi zones paid from general tax revenues, but many of those projects have already been cancelled.
I use Blockbusters movie's by mail program (just like Netflicks). It costs them about 20 cents each way to have the USPS deliver DVDs. Given it is combined with other mail, it is far cheaper than downloading movies and reducing the quality fo service for others. _________________ Vista64 & EX720 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dan1101 EVDO User
Joined: 17 May 2007 Posts: 64
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
The physical DVD still had to be made, and all those DVDs mailed back and forth do collectively make a difference in fuel consumption.
In this "green" world of today, I think everything that can be electronic should be electronic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
operknockity EVDO User
Joined: 05 Jul 2006 Posts: 99 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dan1101 wrote: | | In this "green" world of today, I think everything that can be electronic should be electronic. |
A wonderful green goal. But nothing says that it has to be unlimitted and/or free. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
larrysano EVDO Fledgling
Joined: 17 Jul 2007 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ebiz wrote: | | ... and farmers and cities should have unlimited water, and we should all have unlimited access to aviation and food should be free... ain't going to happen. Someone has to pay for it. | Fine then - so why doesn't sprint (or any other evdo carrier) just charge more for an unlimited plan? Use that extra revenue to upgrade their infrastructure. At least give me the option!!!! These companies need to realize that there are still MANY places in this country without broadband. I live 20 minutes outside of a city whose metropolitan area exceeds 1 million people, and I can't get jack squat (besides evdo). The revenue potential is there, just upgrade your crap and watch the $$ roll in!!!!
Ideally, the phone companies would get off their behinds and start using the universal service fund to upgrade their DSL infrastructure. I mean really, is there any place in this country without phone service yet? What is the USF paying for now then??
EDIT: I found a link to this bill - would be nice if it passed: http://commerce.senate.gov/public/_files/USFforallsecbysec.pdf Oh well, ranting about it here won't help I guess.
I've said it before and I'll say it again - "broadband" web access in this country is a cruel joke. I doubt you'd catch may people in Asia or Europe paying the equivalent of $60/month for a capped connection with an average connection speed of 1.5mbps down and 250kbps up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ebiz EVDO Junkie
Joined: 25 Oct 2006 Posts: 365 Location: Reno, NV
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| larrysano wrote: | | ...so why doesn't sprint (or any other evdo carrier) just charge more for an unlimited plan? Use that extra revenue to upgrade their infrastructure. At least give me the option!!!!... | Simple. If you looked at a table of all users you'd find high users are in the minority. Most of us don't get near 5 GB/month. We don't want to pay more for something we won't need to benefit the few who are high data users. DBy setting the cap (and perhaps charging for usage above that), the telcos just piss off a few of you. Raising prises across the board would piss off far more.
Incidentally, I travel internationally a great deal. US access is better and cheaper than nearly any other country. _________________ Vista64 & EX720 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
larrysano EVDO Fledgling
Joined: 17 Jul 2007 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ebiz wrote: | | Simple. If you looked at a table of all users you'd find high users are in the minority. Most of us don't get near 5 GB/month. | Wow. Sounds like I'm talking to a Sprint CSR here. I'll leave that "argument" alone, as it's been discussed endlessly elsewhere on these boards. | ebiz wrote: | | We don't want to pay more for something we won't need to benefit the few who are high data users. | Ok, read carefully so you'll understand: you won't pay more because you only want what would be the lowest tier of service!!! That's the whole idea of offering different levels - so those who want more can pay for it. Just not through ridiculous, per megabyte charges (of which new Verizon customers are now painfully aware). | ebiz wrote: | | DBy setting the cap (and perhaps charging for usage above that), the telcos just piss off a few of you. Raising prises across the board would piss off far more. | Yeah, great idea. Because people just love getting a LOT less for their money. In that regard, they are raising prices. Not only that, but people don't like worrying about counting bytes while they're online. Why do you think such a big deal is being made about Time Warner's metered internet trial? At least they're offering a tiered usage plan though. | ebiz wrote: | | Incidentally, I travel internationally a great deal. US access is better and cheaper than nearly any other country. | Congratulations on all your travels to who knows where, because it certainly hasn't been to countries 1-14 on this list. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ebiz EVDO Junkie
Joined: 25 Oct 2006 Posts: 365 Location: Reno, NV
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very informative chart, Larry. Thank you. Never worked for a telco. My travels take me to South America, the Middle East and SE Asia mostly. Lower bandwidth and tiers of service seem the norm there. Only rates I pay in Japan and Europe are the daily rates when on a 3 or 4 hour layover at the airport.
Two or three levels of service might be a good solution here too. Particularly for people without alternative providers like you. Perhaps Sprint will offer it in the next few months. _________________ Vista64 & EX720 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
waynefoutz EVDO Junkie
Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Posts: 201
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've logged on to many public hotspots that block P2P software, why can't Sprint? I'm sick of this "5 gigs is plenty of data" argument. No, it isn't, unless you are doing NOTHING but 1994 style static web pages. I've seen some of these kids' myspace pages weigh in at over 70 megs. Why not crack down on the real abusers who are file sharing movies and such?
I just don't understand the logic of investing in a mobile BROADBAND network then telling me I'm abusing the network when I use BROADBAND applications, such as streaming a yahoo news video. Why invest in the speedy network if it was only intended to be used for static web pages and email? Why not just stick with 1xrtt? Seriously, is my life any better because craigslist loaded up in one second as opposed to three? I think not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
titan307 EVDO Newbie
Joined: 17 Jun 2008 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i am one of those people who might someitmes use a lot of bandwidth. depending on how my buisness does each month. i do photography. So i upload my images to pro labs. when i signed up this week i thought i seen a choice of plans, 40Mb month for 39.99 or unlimited for 59.99.
i signed up for unlimited because of what i do and some months i might use 1Gb a month and others i might use 50 Gb but i signed unlimited and i pay more.
If they know who is using all the bandwidth for illegal purposes such as copyright infringements like downloading music or any other illegal file sharing then send them one and only one notice to stop or shut them down, slow them down to dial up speeds or raise the heck out of the price simply because what they are doing is illegal in the first place.
Dont limit the legitimate person for a few bad apples, go after spammers who i bet the really eat up some space, they can find out where it comes from if the want, go after the illegal file sharing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|