Discuss EVDO PC Cards, ExpressCards, EVDO USB, PDAs, Phones, Coverage and Mobile Broadband Cards.
Discuss Verizon and Sprint Coverage. CradlePoint CTR500, MBR1000, PHS300 & Kyocera KR2 & LinkSys WRT54G3G-ST / WRT54G3GV2 Forums!
|
EVDOforums.com
Discussion forum for EVDO users
|
Our sites Include:
EVDO Info :: EVDO Forums :: EVDO Maps :: EVDO Blog :: 3Gstore.com
To purchase your EVDO Card / Antenna / Amplifier / Router from the EVDO Experts, just contact us!
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Michael
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 5246
Location: Cary, IL
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:49 pm Post subject: Forsee Steps Down As Chairman, CEO of Sprint Nextel |
 |
|
| Quote: | Forsee Steps Down As Chairman, CEO of Sprint Nextel
–James Hance, Jr. to serve as acting chairman; Paul Saleh named acting CEO
–Company conducting outside search for new CEO
–Company updates 2007 financial guidance
Contacts:
Media Relations
Leigh Horner, 703-433-3044
leigh.horner@sprint.com
Investor Relations
Kurt Fawkes, 800-259-3755
investor.relations@sprint.com
RESTON, Va. — 10/08/2007
Sprint Nextel announced today that Gary Forsee is stepping down as the company's chairman, president and chief executive officer (CEO), effective immediately. A committee of the Sprint Nextel Board of Directors has been formed and is conducting the search for a new CEO.
James Hance, Jr., a member of the Board of Directors, will assume the role of acting non-executive chairman of the Board. Paul Saleh, current chief financial officer of Sprint Nextel, will serve as acting CEO until a permanent replacement for Forsee is named. With Hance serving in the position of non-executive chairman, the position of lead independent director, held by Irvine Hockaday, will be combined with that role. Hockaday will remain a member of the Board.
"On behalf of the entire board and the Sprint Nextel employees, we want to thank Gary for his dedication and leadership and all of the contributions he has made since becoming chief executive of Sprint in 2003," said Hockaday.
According to Hockaday, the decision to seek a new CEO was based on the Board's belief that it is the right time to put in place new leadership to move the company forward in improving its performance and realizing corporate objectives.
"The Board's search for selecting its next chief executive will focus on candidates outside the company," said Hockaday. "We fully expect that the search will be concluded in a timely manner and we are focused on selecting the right candidate to guide the company to achieve its full potential. Sprint Nextel has the assets, spectrum, customer base and technology to be the leader in wireless mobility services."
Updated Operational Metrics and Financial Guidance
The company announced today that it expects to report a net loss of approximately 337,000 post-paid subscribers in the third quarter. In addition, both adjusted OIBDA* and consolidated operating revenue for 2007 are expected to be slightly below the range of previously provided guidance of $11.0 to $11.5 billion of adjusted OIBDA and $41 to $42 billion of consolidated operating revenue.
Sprint Nextel will release its third-quarter financial results on Thursday, Nov. 1, 2007.
Additional Background on Hance and Saleh
Hance, 63, a senior advisor to The Carlyle Group, is retired vice chairman and former member of the Board of Directors of Bank of America Corporation, where he served as vice chairman from 1993 until January 2005 and as the chief financial officer of Bank of America Corporation from 1988 until April 2004. He is a director of Cousins Properties Incorporated, Duke Energy Corporation and Rayonier Corporation. He has been a member of the Sprint Nextel Board since February 2005.
Saleh, 50, has served as chief financial officer since the merger of Sprint and Nextel. Prior to the merger he had been executive vice president and chief financial officer for Nextel since joining the company in 2001. Before joining Nextel, Saleh was senior vice president and chief financial officer at Walt Disney International from 1997 to 2001, and also served as senior vice president and treasurer for The Walt Disney Company. Prior to Disney, Saleh served as treasurer of Honeywell, where he spent 12 years in various leadership positions in finance, treasury, investor relations, strategic planning and operations.
*FINANCIAL MEASURES
Sprint Nextel provides financial measures generated using generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and using adjustments to GAAP (non-GAAP). The non-GAAP financial measures reflect industry conventions, or standard measures of liquidity, profitability or performance commonly used by the investment community for comparability purposes. These non-GAAP measures are not measurements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These measurements should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, the information contained in our financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. We have defined below each of the non-GAAP measures we use, but these measures may not be synonymous to similar measurement terms used by other companies.
Because Sprint Nextel does not predict special items that might occur in the future, and our forecasts are developed at a level of detail different than that used to prepare GAAP-based financial measures, Sprint Nextel does not provide reconciliations to GAAP of its forward-looking financial measures.
The measure used in this release includes the following:
Adjusted OIBDA is defined as operating income before depreciation, amortization, restructuring and asset impairments, and special items. This non-GAAP measure should be used in addition to, but not as a substitute for, the analysis provided in the statement of operations. We believe that Adjusted OIBDA provide useful information to investors because they are an indicator of the strength and performance of our ongoing business operations, including our ability to fund discretionary spending such as capital expenditures, spectrum acquisitions and other investments and our ability to incur and service debt.
While depreciation and amortization are considered operating costs under generally accepted accounting principles, these expenses primarily represent non-cash current period allocation of costs associated with long-lived assets acquired or constructed in prior periods. Adjusted OIBDA is a calculation commonly used as a basis for investors, analysts and credit rating agencies to evaluate and compare the periodic and future operating performance and value of companies within the telecommunications industry.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This news release includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the securities laws. The statements in this news release regarding forward-looking guidance, as well as other statements that are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are estimates and projections reflecting management's judgment based on currently available information and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. With respect to these forward-looking statements, management has made assumptions regarding, among other things, customer and network usage, customer growth and retention, pricing, operating costs, the timing of various events and the economic environment.
Future performance cannot be assured. Actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Some factors that could cause actual results to differ include:
* the effects of vigorous competition, including the impact of competition on the price we are able to charge customers for services we provide and our ability to attract new customers and retain existing customers; the overall demand for our service offerings, including the impact of decisions of new subscribers between our post-paid and prepaid services offerings and between our two network platforms; and the impact of new, emerging and competing technologies on our business;
* the impact of overall wireless market penetration on our ability to attract and retain customers with good credit standing and the intensified competition among wireless carriers for those customers;
* the uncertainties related to the benefits of our merger with Nextel Communications, Inc., including anticipated synergies and cost savings and the timing thereof;
* the potential impact of difficulties we may encounter in connection with the integration of the pre-merger Sprint and Nextel businesses, and the integration of the businesses and assets of certain of the third party affiliates, or PCS Affiliates, that provide wireless personal communications services, or PCS, under the Sprint® brand that we have acquired, and Nextel Partners, Inc., including the risk that these difficulties could prevent or delay our realization of the cost savings and other benefits we expect to achieve as a result of these integration efforts and the risk that we will be unable to continue to retain key employees;
* the uncertainties related to the implementation of our business strategies, investments in our networks, our systems, and other businesses, including investments required in connection with our planned deployment of a next generation broadband wireless network;
* the costs and business risks associated with providing new services and entering new geographic markets, including with respect to our development of new services expected to be provided using the next generation broadband wireless network that we plan to deploy;
* the impact of potential adverse changes in the ratings afforded our debt securities by ratings agencies;
* the ability of our wireless segment to continue to grow and improve profitability;
* the ability of our long distance segment to achieve expected revenues;
* the effects of mergers and consolidations and new entrants in the communications industry and unexpected announcements or developments from others in the communications industry;
* unexpected results of litigation filed against us;
* the inability of third parties to perform to our requirements under agreements related to our business operations;
* no significant adverse change in Motorola, Inc.'s ability or willingness to provide handsets and related equipment and software applications or to develop new technologies or features for our integrated Digital Enhanced Network, or iDEN®, network;
* the impact of adverse network performance, including, but not limited to, any performance issues resulting from reduced network capacity and other adverse impacts resulting from the reconfiguration of the 800 megahertz, or MHz, band used to operate our iDEN network, as contemplated by the Federal Communications Commission's, or FCC's, Report and Order, released in August 2004 as supplemented thereafter;
* the costs of compliance with regulatory mandates, particularly requirements related to the FCC's Report and Order, deployment of enhanced 911, or E911, services on the iDEN network and privacy-related matters;
* equipment failure, natural disasters, terrorist acts, or other breaches of network or information technology security;
* one or more of the markets in which we compete being impacted by changes in political or other factors such as monetary policy, legal and regulatory changes or other external factors over which we have no control; and
* other risks referenced from time to time in our filings with the SEC, including our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, in Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors," and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q filed in 2007.
Sprint Nextel believes these forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which are based on current expectations and speak only as of the date of this release. Sprint Nextel is not obligated to publicly release any revisions to forward-looking statements to reflect events after the date of this release. |
_________________
EVDO :: EVDO News :: EVDO Antennas :: Buy Verizon :: Buy Sprint :: EVDO Amplifier |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox McCloud
EVDO Junkie
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 618
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was saddened by this news....while I think Forsee screwed up big time on a few things, I'm fairly confident to say he had things right with WiMAX; only and idiot would think that the 3G network has any life left in it....
I'm just afraid this could result in delayed (or canceled) 4G WiMAX deployment....higher priced plans, and subsidized XOHM cards.....let's hope this isn't the case...but if it is...Sprint will probably be "done" in the next couple of years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jim_in_VA
EVDO Junkie
Joined: 09 Apr 2007
Posts: 764
Location: On the Chesapeake Bay, Virginia
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hmm..,Sprint stock goes down on the news, Clearwire stock goes up |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fox McCloud
EVDO Junkie
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 618
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jim_in_VA wrote: | | hmm..,Sprint stock goes down on the news, Clearwire stock goes up |
I'd guess because some investors are smart enough to realize that the majority of other investors have no clue what WiMAX is (or its potential) and that the next CEO might ax XOHM.
it's a shame that the investors in Sprint weren't more well informed....if they were, they would have invested more in Sprint because of XOHM's potential. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AmazinglySmooth
EVDO User
Joined: 17 May 2006
Posts: 73
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think evdo revA has lots of legs to stand on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fox McCloud
EVDO Junkie
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 618
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AmazinglySmooth wrote: | | I think evdo revA has lots of legs to stand on. |
not when there's only one data-only T1 line per tower (unless you're in a fairly large city, then there will be two), the latency can't compete with other broadband, and it only supports a maximum of 3.1 meg down and 1.8 meg up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AmazinglySmooth
EVDO User
Joined: 17 May 2006
Posts: 73
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fox McCloud wrote: | | AmazinglySmooth wrote: | | I think evdo revA has lots of legs to stand on. |
not when there's only one data-only T1 line per tower (unless you're in a fairly large city, then there will be two), the latency can't compete with other broadband, and it only supports a maximum of 3.1 meg down and 1.8 meg up. |
I think it competes by being more mobile. If you need fixed then buy fixed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fox McCloud
EVDO Junkie
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 618
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AmazinglySmooth wrote: | | Fox McCloud wrote: | | AmazinglySmooth wrote: | | I think evdo revA has lots of legs to stand on. |
not when there's only one data-only T1 line per tower (unless you're in a fairly large city, then there will be two), the latency can't compete with other broadband, and it only supports a maximum of 3.1 meg down and 1.8 meg up. |
I think it competes by being more mobile. If you need fixed then buy fixed. |
why have a tree when you can have the whole forest?
WiMAX is just that; it has the low latency AND bandwidth to compete with fixed broadband services. Not only that, but it's also mobile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AmazinglySmooth
EVDO User
Joined: 17 May 2006
Posts: 73
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fox McCloud wrote: | | AmazinglySmooth wrote: | | Fox McCloud wrote: | | AmazinglySmooth wrote: | | I think evdo revA has lots of legs to stand on. |
not when there's only one data-only T1 line per tower (unless you're in a fairly large city, then there will be two), the latency can't compete with other broadband, and it only supports a maximum of 3.1 meg down and 1.8 meg up. |
I think it competes by being more mobile. If you need fixed then buy fixed. |
why have a tree when you can have the whole forest?
WiMAX is just that; it has the low latency AND bandwidth to compete with fixed broadband services. Not only that, but it's also mobile. |
If wimax were free to deploy, and if they hadn't spent the money to go to evdo revA, then I'd agree it is obviously the better. However, it never makes sense to invest in something and not achieve a return. Sprint needs to sell evdo revA before it gets to wimax. They can launch wimax, but price it so that evdo revA isn't shut out. It just has to be positioned correctly, which I think Sprint has done a horrible job at. I still cannot believe people are signing up for the iPhone when its data service is incredibly slow. It just goes to showing that people don't even know what Sprint is offering. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fox McCloud
EVDO Junkie
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 618
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AmazinglySmooth wrote: | | If wimax were free to deploy, and if they hadn't spent the money to go to evdo revA, then I'd agree it is obviously the better. However, it never makes sense to invest in something and not achieve a return. Sprint needs to sell evdo revA before it gets to wimax. They can launch wimax, but price it so that evdo revA isn't shut out. It just has to be positioned correctly, which I think Sprint has done a horrible job at. I still cannot believe people are signing up for the iPhone when its data service is incredibly slow. It just goes to showing that people don't even know what Sprint is offering. |
A lot of people knew about how slow the iPhone was; they just didn't care because it was an Apple product.
EVDO wouldn't be shut out right away; keep in mind that most likely Sprint's XOHM service would be for cameras, game systems, laptops, PCs, modems, and the like before they came to a phone (giving plenty of time to suck the life out of EVDO Revision A).
XOHM is kind of like Verizon's FiOS; an awesome and great idea that has amazing potential....but the investors are just too stupid to understand what it is, how great it is, and what it's potential is (also they seem to not realize the best investments are hardly ever short-term, but long-term). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AmazinglySmooth
EVDO User
Joined: 17 May 2006
Posts: 73
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fox McCloud wrote: | | AmazinglySmooth wrote: | | If wimax were free to deploy, and if they hadn't spent the money to go to evdo revA, then I'd agree it is obviously the better. However, it never makes sense to invest in something and not achieve a return. Sprint needs to sell evdo revA before it gets to wimax. They can launch wimax, but price it so that evdo revA isn't shut out. It just has to be positioned correctly, which I think Sprint has done a horrible job at. I still cannot believe people are signing up for the iPhone when its data service is incredibly slow. It just goes to showing that people don't even know what Sprint is offering. |
A lot of people knew about how slow the iPhone was; they just didn't care because it was an Apple product.
EVDO wouldn't be shut out right away; keep in mind that most likely Sprint's XOHM service would be for cameras, game systems, laptops, PCs, modems, and the like before they came to a phone (giving plenty of time to suck the life out of EVDO Revision A).
XOHM is kind of like Verizon's FiOS; an awesome and great idea that has amazing potential....but the investors are just too stupid to understand what it is, how great it is, and what it's potential is (also they seem to not realize the best investments are hardly ever short-term, but long-term). |
The CEO's role is to convince the investors that something is worth investing in. If he cannot, then he has not done 1/2 of his job. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xenophon
EVDO Addict
Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 2004
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The appeal of WiMAX is not a slight increase in performance, but that it could be available on any consumer device. You could potentially buy devices at Best Buy that happen to have WiMAX and you don't even know it.
The brilliance on Sprint's part is that they wouldn't have to market WiMAX in the same traditional manner as cell service. You'd be accidentally buying such devices, later on find out there is a signal and then decide if you want to use the signal, not even needing to know it is Sprint. And since there is no contract, you just use as you need it or commit to it longer term if you have a use for it.
That is the huge opportunity they could be missing out on. It has the potential of being a self-marketing service through a ubiquity of devicex they don't control. They need to get away from the stodgy, closed telcom model and become an open data network that feeds pre-existing devices that they and consumer product makers don't have to certify with each other.
Voice-specific networks are so last century and need to be gone in 10 years. The future is wireless data networks and voice will just be one of many services on top of that. WiMAX is better suited for this model than EVDO RevC or LTE, which will likely head down the same path of telcom Nazi-ism.
But Wall St. only cares about the short term and apparently can't give this a chance, much less comprehend it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jackrodgers
EVDO Addict
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1131
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Please folks, use the proper term.
There are very few investors who own stock. They are all mostly speculators.
The investor would be the person who bought the stock originally and gave money to the corporation owning the stock. After that first sale everyone else is a speculator hoping to gain enormous profits when their purchase rises in salability. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xrayman
EVDO Junkie
Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 313
Location: Kansas City
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fox McCloud
EVDO Junkie
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 618
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
not good, if you ask me.....now ,if it was a separate company, but still under Sprint's control (just like Sprintlink is), that'd probably be ok...but a completely separate company? Ehh....I dunno.
Either way, I'm definitely not pleased with these results....for once we have a chance to be "on-par" (or better) than the rest of the world with cellphone technology...and this could keep us in the "stone ages" for quite a while.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Buy from the 3G Experts @ 3Gstore.com
Sprint MiFi $59.99
CradlePoint CTR500
Purchase a MBR1000
CTR350 Router
CradlePoint PHS300
Sprint Rev A USB: Compass 597
Sprint Rev A ExpressCard: Merlin EX720
Purchase an V740 Rev A ExpressCard
Purchase an EVDO Booster Antenna
Purchase an EVDO Amplifier
Your Mac EVDO Experts
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
