Discuss EVDO PCMCIA Cards, ExpressCards, EVDO USB, PDAs, Phones, Coverage and Mobile Broadband Cards.
Discuss Verizon and Sprint Coverage. CradlePoint CTR350, CTR500, PHS300, MBR1000, MBR1200, PHS300. Discuss Improving signal with 3Gstore Antennas and Amplifiers.
|
EVDOforums.com Discussion forum for EVDO users
|
Our sites Include:
EVDO Info :: EVDO Forums :: EVDO Maps :: EVDO Blog :: 3Gstore.com
To purchase your EVDO Card / Antenna / Amplifier / Router from the EVDO Experts, just contact us!
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
snowmane36 EVDO Newbie
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:31 pm Post subject: Would pilot pollution cause slow speeds with a good signal? |
|
|
Hello-
I have been getting slow speeds lately. I got into the ##DEBUG screen in the connection manager, and noticed I have sometimes four active service pilots operating at the same time, and also an active pilot in the 1xRTT column.
I researched this on the forums here, and I was wondering if this could cause the slow speeds even with the good signal.
Would a directional antenna help? I recently got an amplifier with a dual band antenna which is not, I guess, able to be pointed in a certain direction.
Thanks very much for any information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
n6gn EVDO Junkie
Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 577 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know for sure, but unless you simultaneously have pretty good paths to multiple carriers/sites, I doubt that your slowdown is due to pilot pollution.
So many things go into a correctly functioning(e.g. high speed) up/down link that it's hard to say without a lot of study what's going on. I suppose some hints would be whether or not you see a diurnal variation in performance that might correlate with multiple users, whether you have large signal strength, whether the other PNs are similar in strength etc etc.
A directional antenna should help simplify things and let you isolate performance degradation though. I'd think even a moderately low gain reflector antenna having reasonable F/B ratio should greatly reduce the potential for contribution from multiple sites.
On top of physical/link layer issues there are the questions of backhaul and network capacity too, I suppose.
When things are slowing down, you might try driving underneath the preferred carrier's antenna and see if doing so restores performance. I'd suspect that if you get close enough to the site and close enough to free space path loss that you'll have removed many of the physical layer possibilities and problems from the equation.
n6gn |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
snowmane36 EVDO Newbie
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:12 pm Post subject: broadband info |
|
|
Below is the debug screen when I had the powered amp and non-directional dual band antenna hooked up.
Thanks very much for all the information and advice. I have started keeping track of my speeds during the day and night, so I can tell if there is any pattern. I have already noticed that when the signal strength increases, the download speed decreases.
As you noted, there could be several causes for the slow speeds, so I will use your advice to try to narrow it down. Driving by the tower and noting any speed changes is an excellent idea.
Last edited by snowmane36 on Sat Nov 14, 2009 7:29 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
snowmane36 EVDO Newbie
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:44 pm Post subject: broadband info |
|
|

Last edited by snowmane36 on Sat Nov 14, 2009 3:17 pm; edited 4 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
n6gn EVDO Junkie
Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 577 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:36 pm Post subject: Re: broadband info |
|
|
| snowmane36 wrote: | | I tried to post an image showing the debug screen and speed test results, but it was rejected. |
I'm not sure where you were or what antenna you were using when capturing this debug screen but it looks to me like there is adequate signal for either 1xRTT or EVDO but very high packet error rate. Eb/N0 doesn't seem to give me a clue as to the cause of errors (e.g. interference). From the signal strength, it doesn't look like you were right under the cell site.
Since you indicated that more signal gave *slower* speeds, I'm beginning to wondering if you have a distortion problem in your hardware -as though strong signals self-generated more interference. Did you have an external amplifier in-line when you measured this?
n6gn |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
snowmane36 EVDO Newbie
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:32 pm Post subject: update on speeds |
|
|
Hello-
Thanks very much for your reply. I was using an in-line powered amp with a magnetic mount non-directional antenna. I got a good signal strength increase with it, but not a speed increase.
I drove over to the towers this weekend - there are two located about 4 miles away within 200 feet of each other (I don't know if I get signals from both or just one of them). My speed at the towers was 1.7 megabits/sec with the amp and antenna hooked up. I used antennasearch. com to find the towers.
I got a different antenna today, a Yagi type, and hooked it up to the same amp, pointed it at the towers, and now have speeds of 1.0 - 1.15 Mb/s, which very pleasantly surprised me. Right before I hooked the yagi up the speed was .30.
These forums have great information and have helped me a bunch. I guess wired broadband is pretty straightforward, but the wireless kind takes a lot of tweaking to get it just right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
n6gn EVDO Junkie
Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 577 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From the previous slowdown-with-amp-antenna problem you reported, I'd suggest pitching the amplifier and just using as much directional antenna (yagi or better) as you can muster.
n6gn |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gator EVDO Fledgling
Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Multipath can impair data speed regardless of signal strength. It is similar to ghosts on an analog tv. The reflected signal arrives later than the desired signal. The directional antenna rejects signals from the sides and back of the antenna. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
n6gn EVDO Junkie
Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 577 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gator wrote: | | Multipath can impair data speed regardless of signal strength. | That's a good point. However, if signals are strong - approaching the free space loss for the ERP, antennas and path length, it is unlikely that there is a second or third (indirect) path that approaches the signal strength of the main one. Also, for CDMA systems, energy from multiple paths can be correlated and used to aid communication rather than just generating bit errors. This is the RAKE feature of CDMA systems. In actuality, for most situations, one path is dominant and the gains due to aggregating energy from multiple paths are relatively small.
Generally speaking, multipath becomes more significant as path quality degrades. That is, for near LOS paths, the relative energy arriving from other paths is usually pretty small. For very bad paths, energy from an indirect path, such as reflection and diffraction, can dominate. There can be situations where there is a really good secondary path, such as when there's a nearby specular reflector (mirror-like, perhaps a big wall or similar planar conducting surface) near a mobile user, but these aren't terribly common.
The situations marked by having multi-path energy with comparable intensities from different paths generate the very deep fades, due to periodic near perfect cancellation. These are what really bad airplane induced fades sometimes were in over-air (analog) TV reception. Fades could be so deep that TV synch as well as picture was lost.
If signal strength is not more than a few dB, maybe even 10-20, from what it would be in a perfect, line-of-sight and free space situation, it isn't terribly likely that a second path is terribly influential. It can happen but it's not too common, in my opinion.
n6gn |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xrayman EVDO Junkie
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 320 Location: Kansas City
|
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| After you ditch the amp and get the directional antenna as N6GN said, I would also ditch the Franklin device. Some think the Franklin device is more likely to lock onto multiple pilots than other Sprint devices. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
snowmane36 EVDO Newbie
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 11:49 am Post subject: another debug screen |
|
|
I am posting another debug screen below where I have my new yagi antenna hooked up to the powered amplifier. It shows the increased speeds.
I also took a speed test with the modem in the router about 15 minutes later, and that was even faster.
It will take a different connector to plug the yagi cable directly into the modem, bypassing the amplifier, but if I can find one I will see what speeds I get with just the antenna hooked up.
Thanks very much for all the information-I appreciate all of you taking the time to respond and help with my problem.
Last edited by snowmane36 on Sat Nov 14, 2009 7:30 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
snowmane36 EVDO Newbie
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 11:57 am Post subject: the debug screen with yagi and amp |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Buy from the 3G Experts @ 3Gstore.com
 CradlePoint MBR1200 $269.99
 Sprint MiFi $59.99
 CTR500 $179.99
 MBR1000 $189.99
 CTR350 $89.99
 PHS300 $159.99
 Sprint 598U - Free
 Sprint Rev A ExpressCard: Merlin EX720 - Free
 Purchase an EVDO Booster Antenna
 Purchase an EVDO Amplifier
 Your Mac EVDO Experts
|
|